CorridorIQDocumentation risk assessment

Two documents. Both cleared review. One machine that cannot pass its own health check.

From December, a defective manual is a defective product.

CorridorIQ assesses whether a manufacturer's instruction set would hold up, and reports it to the party carrying the loss. One product family, five days, a rating and a findings register.

HB40-MM-002Revision 4

Maintenance manual, technical data

Platen force400 kN

System operating pressure250 bar

Reservoir capacity180 litres

Reviewed in isolation: passes

HB40-HC-004Revision 2

Health check guide, check 7

MethodGauge at test point

Pass criterion230 bar ± 10

Reviewed in isolation: passes

Critical finding

A machine set correctly to the manual fails its own health check. An engineer who adjusts it to pass has set the relief valve twenty bar below stated operating pressure. Neither document is wrong. They are wrong together.

Exposureheld, not made

The manufacturer writes the document. Somebody else carries it.

From 9 December 2026, inadequate instructions make a product defective, and that liability cannot be limited by contract. The parties who priced the risk have no way to see inside it.

Brokers

Placing product liability for manufacturers, with no view of the document exposure inside the risk.

Authorised representatives

Carrying the obligation for non-EU principals, usually with no documentation capability at all.

Solicitors

Instructed after a claim, needing to know whether the instruction set was defensible.

Importers

Inheriting manufacturer obligations at the point of placing on the market, frequently unaware of it.

3 of 8 findingsshown here

A contradiction should be a query, not a discovery.

Every value, interval, term and claim in the set becomes a row carrying its source. Two rows with the same name and different values sit next to each other. Nobody has to notice anything.

Parameter register, extract Kelfield HB40 baling press — demonstration set

ParameterValueSourceStatus
Platen force400 kNMM-002 §3Clear
System operating pressure250 barMM-002 §3Critical
System pressure, acceptance230 ± 10 barHC-004 Ck 7Critical
Interlock test interval6 monthsMM-002 §7Major
Interlock test interval12 monthsHC-004 Ck 2Major
Accumulator pre-chargeNo sourceCritical

Eight findings were returned across three documents. All eight sit between documents. Within each document, none was found.

Timelinethree dates

Three dates, and only one of them is being talked about.

9 December 2026

Product Liability Directive (EU) 2024/2853. Liability cannot be excluded or limited by contract. Disclosure obligations apply in proceedings. What changes

20 January 2027

Machinery Regulation (EU) 2023/1230. Replaces Directive 2006/42/EC. Four of the seven grounds of formal non-compliance are documentation failures. What changes

2 August 2028

AI Act, Annex I. Technical documentation must exist before market placement and be retained for ten years.

Two routesassess, then rebuild

Find out what the set carries. Then fix what it carries.

Documentation risk assessment

One manufacturer, one product family. Five days, desk-based. A rating, a findings register, and a determination of who carries the manufacturer obligation.

Technical documentation

Manuals, maintenance documents, health check guides, installation guides and datasheets, authored from drawings and engineer input. Remediation after an assessment, or new documentation from the start.

How an assessment is run, and what it is not

Send one product family. We will tell you what sits between the documents.

A non-disclosure agreement is in place before any technical material is received.

  • The manufacturer and the product family involved
  • Which documents exist, and which are referred to but not held
  • Whether this is pre-bind, renewal, a risk improvement condition, or a claim
  • Your timescale